JAIST Repository >
School of Knowledge Science >
Articles >
Journal Articles >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10119/5023

Title: Consensus-making Support Systems dedicated to Creative Problem Solving
Authors: Kunifuji, Susumu
Kato, Naotaka
Keywords: Creativity support system
decision making support system
bottom-up decision making
KJ method
AHP
Issue Date: 2007-09
Publisher: World Scientific Publishing
Magazine name: International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making
Volume: 6
Number: 3
Start page: 459
End page: 474
DOI: 10.1142/S0219622007002575
Abstract: There are many creative thinking manual methods in the world. They are brain-storming method, brain-writing method, mind mapping, NM method, Equivalent Transformation method, KJ method, etc. Human thinking process for creative problem solving consists of 4 sub-processes. They are divergent thinking sub-process, convergent thinking sub-process, idea crystallization sub-process, and idea verification sub-process. In accordance with this proposal, most Japanese research and development is centered on this four types of creative thinking manual methods and support systems. In this paper, we describe three types of Group Decision Support Systems (DSSs) for creative problem solving, similar to KJ method. All design philosophy depends on bottom-up decision-making. They are knowledge acquisition support groupware GRAPE, consensus-making support systems Group Coordinator (I) and Group Coordinator (II). The characteristic function of GRAPE is knowledge merging for GRAPE users, and that of Group-Coordinator (I) and Group-Coordinator (II) is tradeoff resolution by sensitivity analysis and adjusting of user requirements by the QDA method, respectively. The systems that we have developed are similar to the KJ method, which is the most popular methodology for creative problem solving in Japan. The essence of our developed methodology and tools is that it boosts intellectual productivity. GRAPE and its successors can speed-up the given group decision making problem by two to three times with respect to the idea crystallization (evaluation and judgment) sub-process.
Rights: Electronic version of an article published as International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 6(3), 2007, 459-474. DOI:10.1142/S0219622007002575. Copyright World Scientific Publishing Company, http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219622007002575
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10119/5023
Material Type: author
Appears in Collections:a10-1. 雑誌掲載論文 (Journal Articles)

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
C6054.pdf643KbAdobe PDFView/Open

All items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

 


Contact : Library Information Section, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology